A SaaS founder was preparing to acquire an e-commerce brand. The seller demanded a 3.5M purchase price, citing a standard 4x multiple on a reported trailing-twelve-month EBITDA of 900k. The buyer needed rigorous financial due diligence before signing.
We stress-tested the seller's financials and uncovered a critical hidden formula error: the seller had calculated their highest-cost recent months using expense data from the prior year. We rebuilt the financial model with correct logic — exposing the true EBITDA as 450k, exactly half of what was claimed.
Book a free call and we'll show you exactly where your numbers can work harder.
Book a Free Call